Roland Garros ATP: Sebastian Baez vs Roman Andres Burruchaga

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Sebastian Baez and Roman Andres Burruchaga are scheduled to meet in the first or early rounds of Roland Garros in May 2026, with the match originally set for 5:00 AM ET on 24 May. The 0% crowd probability reflects either minimal trading activity or a technical listing issue, as both players are active on the ATP circuit and the fixture sits within the tournament's standard draw window. Settlement depends on a clear winner being determined by 31 May; any cancellation, tie, or delay beyond seven days from the scheduled date triggers a 50-50 split.

Baez, an Argentine left-hander, has competed regularly on clay and holds a ranking history that places him in contention for main-draw spots at majors, though his seeding and draw position remain unconfirmed for 2026. Burruchaga, also Argentine, operates at a lower ranking tier and typically appears in qualifying or lower-seeded first-round matchups. Historical patterns suggest that when two players of differing ranking tiers meet at Roland Garros, the higher-ranked player advances in roughly 70–75% of cases, though clay-court variables and head-to-head records can shift those odds materially.

Traders should monitor official Roland Garros draw releases and ATP ranking updates as the tournament approaches. Withdrawal announcements, injury reports, or late qualifying results could alter match likelihood or trigger cancellation provisions. Payment friction on entry—SEPA transfers, Klarna instalments, and USDC on-ramps—may explain the thin liquidity; deeper book depth typically follows once deposit rails stabilise and traders gain confidence in settlement certainty.

Methodology

We track Roland Garros ATP: Sebastian Baez vs Roman Andres Burruchaga on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Klarna UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Klarna UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.