🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGo to the live market →

LoL: Maze Gaming vs Malvinas Gaming (BO5) - LRS Playoffs

Which platform accepts which deposit method for "LoL: Maze Gaming vs Malvinas Gaming (BO5) - LRS Playoffs"? Klarna, SOFORT, card, USDC compared.

Game 2 Winner 100% Game 3 Winner 100% Match Winner 100% O/U 3.5 Games 100% Volume: $150K Liquidity: $467K Closes: 5 Aug 2026
Open live market →
LoL: Maze Gaming vs Malvinas Gaming (BO5) - LRS Playoffs

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via Polymarket Klarna UK) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Go to the live market →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Go to the live market →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Go to the live market →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Go to the live market →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Go to the live market →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Game 2 Winner100%
Game 3 Winner100%
Match Winner100%
O/U 3.5 Games100%
O/U 4.5 Games100%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon90%
Odd/Even Total Kills90%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon90%
Odd/Even Total Kills90%
Odd/Even Total Kills90%
Odd/Even Total Kills51%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor50%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon50%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors50%
Any Player Quadra Kill50%
Any Player Penta Kill50%
Odd/Even Total Kills50%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor50%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon50%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors50%
Any Player Quadra Kill50%
Any Player Penta Kill50%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor10%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors10%
Any Player Quadra Kill10%
Any Player Penta Kill10%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor10%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors10%
Any Player Quadra Kill10%
Any Player Penta Kill10%
Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor10%
Both Teams Slay a Dragon10%
Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors10%
Any Player Quadra Kill10%
Any Player Penta Kill10%
Game 1 Winner0%
Game 4 Winner0%
Game Handicap: MAZ (-1.5) vs Malvinas Gaming (+1.5)0%
Game Handicap: MAZ (-2.5) vs Malvinas Gaming (+2.5)0%

Market context

Maze Gaming and Malvinas Gaming are scheduled for a best-of-five in the LRS playoffs lower-bracket quarter-final, with the series originally listed for 4 August and some fixtures databases later showing an 11 August slot, so timing risk matters as much as team form.[1][2][8] The market’s current 0% YES price is well below the broader pre-match consensus, where other esports pages have Maze as the clear favourite and, in one crowd sample, the overwhelming choice.[3][4][9]

Historical read-through points towards Maze having the stronger baseline. Maze beat Malvinas 2–0 in their July group-stage meeting, and the teams’ prior series record in Strafe’s database also favours Maze, which helps explain why independent pricing has leaned hard towards Maze rather than an upset.[6][9][14] That said, the market structure here is sensitive to whether the match is actually played and completed, so a low YES price can also reflect settlement uncertainty rather than pure sporting opinion.

For traders focused on funding flow, the main catalyst is whether the fixture is confirmed and stays inside the settlement window; any postponement beyond seven days, cancellation, or an unfinished series changes the payout rules materially. On-ramp friction also matters for book depth: markets that attract fast deposits through card rails, Klarna-style pay-later products, or low-friction SEPA transfers tend to trade tighter than those depending on slower bank funding, while USDC users can add liquidity quickly when a match is moving.[10]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page compares LoL: Maze Gaming vs Malvinas Gaming (BO5) - LRS Playoffs with a focus on payment rails and deposit friction. Polymarket accepts USDC on Polygon only; Kalshi only ACH/Plaid (US only); Betfair card/SEPA in EU/UK; Manifold no deposit. Polymarket Klarna UK additionally offers Klarna and SOFORT as fiat on-ramps to USDC. Live odds reflect the Polymarket order book.

Resolution & payout

Settlement path determines payout latency. Polymarket settles on-chain (USDC, minutes). Broker frontends like Polymarket Klarna UK add Klarna/SOFORT as fiat withdrawal options with T+1 processing. Kalshi: USD via ACH (T+1 to T+3). Betfair: local currency via card/SEPA (T+1 to T+5).

FAQ

How does Klarna deposit work on Polymarket Klarna UK?
You enter the deposit amount in EUR/GBP, choose Klarna as the method, run through Klarna's standard authentication (Pay Later or Direct Bank Transfer), and Polymarket Klarna UK converts internally to USDC for the Polymarket order book. Processing: typically under 30 minutes.
What does SOFORT cost as a deposit method?
Polymarket Klarna UK charges no fees for SOFORT. The only cost is the internal FX spread (typically <1%) on EUR→USDC conversion. SOFORT itself has no end-user fees — the platform absorbs acquirer costs.
Which payment methods are supported?
Klarna (Pay Now / Pay Later), SOFORT, SEPA bank transfer, credit card (Visa/Mastercard), Apple Pay, Google Pay, and direct USDC deposit on Polygon. Availability depends on your jurisdiction.
What's the minimum deposit?
10 EUR / 10 USD equivalent. No upper limit, but deposits over $1,500 lifetime volume trigger a quick KYC flow (typically 5-10 minutes).
How do withdrawals work?
Identical methods in reverse. SEPA withdrawal: T+1 (standard) or under 10 seconds (SEPA Instant). Klarna withdrawals process via bank-account refund. USDC withdrawal to external wallet: Polygon gas cost (typically $0.01).
and

Trade LoL: Maze Gaming vs Malvinas Gaming (BO5) - LRS Play… on Polymarket Klarna UK

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →