Counter-Strike: Rune Eaters vs Bushido Wildcats (BO3) - CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series#3 Group D

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Rune Eaters and Bushido Wildcats are scheduled to meet in a best-of-three at the CCT Europe Closed Qualifier: Series #3 Group D. The market is already fully priced at a 100% implied chance of Bushido Wildcats, which usually indicates that traders have either seen line-up information, a schedule update, or simple liquidity imbalance rather than a routine matchup read. In these low-profile CS2 qualifiers, book depth often comes from a handful of deposits arriving close to start time, especially where payment friction matters: faster on-ramp rails such as Klarna and SEPA tend to support smaller, more reactive flow, while USDC deposits can add size more quickly once the event is confirmed.

Comparable CCT Europe qualifier markets often settle fast once a live score page appears and both teams are fielded on time, but they can also reprice sharply if one side posts an altered roster or if the match is pushed out of the planned window. GosuGamers, Sofascore and other fixture pages all list the meeting for 21 May at 17:00 UTC, with Bushido Wildcats favoured by external odds feeds such as bo3.gg and by Strafe’s user vote share. That combination suggests the current price is less about uncertainty over the fixture itself and more about whether enough funded accounts are still active to maintain depth through the settlement window.

Traders should watch for official match-room confirmation, any late schedule change from the organiser, and whether the series begins before the 23:50 UTC settlement cut-off. If the match is delayed beyond seven days, or if it is cancelled or ends without a winner, the market can revert to 50-50 under the rules. In practice, the main catalyst is not the headline ranking gap but the funding flow around the event: late deposits, withdrawal timing, and whether the market can absorb orders once the map veto or starting line-ups are posted.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.